Field performance of experimental sugarbeet varieties in the University of Idaho variety

trial at Patterson Farms, Jerome County, Idaho, 1999.
Root Yield1 Sugar Content Gross Sugar Conduc- tivity Extrac- tion Estimated Recoverable Sugar Curly Top Rating2
VARIETY (T/A) (%) (lbs/A) (mmhos) (%) (lbs/T) (lbs/A) 1999
American Crystal
ACH 211 Check3,4 36.14 17.75 12835 0.839 83.94 298.0 10779 5.2
ACH 9901 38.68 17.58 13597 0.895 83.16 292.3 11308 4.7
ACH 99064,5 35.38 16.97 11999 0.904 82.92 281.5 9951 5.2
Betaseed
Beta 4KG5996 37.58 18.16 13650 0.850 83.87 304.7 11453 5.1
Beta 5CG7347 36.74 18.11 13295 0.787 84.71 306.8 11261 4.7
Beta 5KJ50174 40.94 17.05 13964 0.928 82.62 281.8 11539 4.6
Beta 7CG7015 37.05 17.31 12813 0.962 82.20 284.8 10533 4.5
Beta 7CG7022 38.23 17.43 13322 0.916 82.85 288.9 11038 4.2
Beta 7KJ50734 41.81 17.54 14665 0.937 82.59 289.7 12114 5.3
Beta 7KJ51094 36.09 17.66 12734 0.871 83.50 294.9 10635 5.4
Beta 8422 Check3,4 37.33 17.77 13267 0.903 83.08 295.4 11028 4.7
Hilleshog Mono Hy
HM 1642 38.65 17.93 13854 0.808 84.40 302.6 11695 4.9
HM 2930 40.04 17.72 14181 0.797 84.50 299.5 11982 4.2
HM 2931 38.03 17.77 13513 0.807 84.38 299.9 11401 4.4
HM 2932 (Blend) 40.91 17.40 14237 0.786 84.59 294.4 12044 4.0
HM 29804 40.54 17.34 14064 0.909 82.93 287.7 11666 4.9
HM 29814 35.60 17.64 12532 0.892 83.21 293.5 10428 4.7
HM 29824 41.98 16.71 14035 0.928 82.57 276.0 11589 5.0
HM Owyhee Check3,4 39.33 17.51 13771 0.821 84.14 294.7 11591 4.2
HM PM15 (Blend) 37.02 17.58 13005 0.781 84.69 297.8 11013 4.3
HM PM21 Check3,4 38.17 17.57 13416 0.748 85.12 299.1 11420 4.6
Holly Hybrids-Spreckels
HH 97HX706 38.80 17.98 13954 0.822 84.22 302.9 11756 5.9
HH 98HX802 41.65 16.48 13713 0.953 82.17 270.8 11268 5.2
HH 99HX901 37.13 17.52 13008 0.922 82.79 290.1 10768 5.4
HH 99HX902 38.34 16.89 12952 0.898 82.99 280.5 10750 5.7
HH 99HX905 37.66 17.09 12871 0.916 82.78 283.0 10659 5.9
Seedex
SX 1513 36.23 16.54 11973 0.880 83.16 275.2 9962 4.7
SX 1514 37.89 17.11 12967 0.769 84.76 290.1 10989 4.3
SX 1515 39.57 17.46 13823 0.802 84.39 294.7 11662 4.1
Susceptible Check 6.4
US 41 (Resistant Check) 4.7
LSD (0.05) 1.86 0.47 665 0.078 1.10 10.4 603
LSD (0.10) 1.56 0.39 557 0.066 0.92 8.7 505
CV (%) 4.9 2.7 5.0 9.1 1.3 3.6 5.4
Pr>F 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
When comparing yields or sugars of two varieties, the values must differ by a value equal to or greater than the LSD given at the bottom of each column. If they do not, then they were probably not different in this test.

Planted April 5, 1999; Harvested October 12-13, 1999

1 Root yields have been tared 5%.
2 Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top resistance of two or more varieties, use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.
3 Commercial check varieties.
4 Entered in 1999 rhizomania variety test.
5 Entered as a rhizoctonia resistant variety.

                                                                      U of I Sugarbeet Home Page                                         Back One Page