Field performance of experimental sugarbeet varieties in the University of Idaho variety

trial at the Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, Idaho, 1999.
Root  Yield1 Sugar Content Gross Sugar Conduc- tivity Extrac- tion Estimated Recoverable Sugar Curly Top Rating2
VARIETY (T/A) (%) (lbs/A) (mmhos) (%) (lbs/T) (lbs/A) 1999
American Crystal
ACH 211 Check3,4 33.52 16.79 11281 0.805 84.21 283.0 9515 5.2
ACH 9901 36.45 16.30 11894 1.006 81.38 265.8 9703 4.7
ACH 99064,5 34.45 15.92 10969 0.884 82.96 264.6 9116 5.2
Betaseed
Beta 4KG5996 34.79 16.30 11356 0.898 82.86 270.1 9398 5.1
Beta 5CG7347 35.97 16.65 11977 0.806 84.17 280.4 10087 4.7
Beta 5KJ50174 38.26 15.99 12225 0.948 82.12 262.7 10040 4.6
Beta 7CG7015 35.72 15.88 11338 0.993 81.49 259.1 9241 4.5
Beta 7CG7022 36.45 16.22 11831 0.90 82.82 268.8 9808 4.2
Beta 7KJ50734 40.10 16.70 13416 0.893 83.02 277.4 11141 5.3
Beta 7KJ51094 35.83 16.11 11548 0.910 82.68 266.5 9552 5.4
Beta 8422 Check3,4 35.66 16.61 11835 0.889 83.06 276.0 9832 4.7
Hilleshog Mono Hy
HM 1642 36.68 17.14 12565 0.794 84.41 289.7 10613 4.9
HM 2930 38.96 16.85 13121 0.789 84.45 284.6 11082 4.2
HM 2931 38.65 15.82 12123 0.881 83.01 262.6 10065 4.4
HM 2932 (Blend) 37.38 16.92 12622 0.781 84.57 286.2 10674 4.0
HM 29804 36.28 16.40 11898 0.923 82.56 270.9 9822 4.9
HM 29814 34.08 16.27 11095 0.934 82.36 268.0 9149 4.7
HM 29824 39.40 16.11 12706 0.842 83.59 269.4 10622 5.0
HM Owyhee Check3,4 37.50 16.82 12614 0.799 84.31 283.6 10639 4.2
HM PM15 (Blend) 36.50 16.89 12334 0.749 84.98 287.1 10483 4.3
HM PM21 Check3,4 37.92 16.52 12522 0.768 84.66 279.8 10603 4.6
Holly Hybrids-Spreckels
HH 97HX706 33.86 17.13 11601 0.775 84.69 290.2 9825 5.9
HH 98HX802 37.27 15.76 11746 0.899 82.75 261.0 9722 5.2
HH 99HX901 34.14 16.63 11364 0.859 83.45 277.7 9492 5.4
HH 99HX902 34.22 16.40 11220 0.835 83.75 274.8 9399 5.7
HH 99HX905 35.35 16.94 11967 0.794 84.39 286.0 10099 5.9
Seedex
SX 1513 33.08 15.48 10232 0.917 82.43 255.3 8436 4.7
SX 1514 38.53 16.39 12632 0.790 84.33 276.5 10659 4.3
SX 1515 39.15 16.33 12796 0.806 84.11 274.7 10767 4.1
Susceptible Check 6.4
US 41 (Resistant Check) 4.7
LSD (0.05) 2.18 0.66 850 0.106 1.54 15.0 794
LSD (0.10) 1.82 0.55 713 0.089 1.29 12.6 666
CV (%) 5.9 4.0 7.0 12.2 1.8 7.9 5.4
Pr>F 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
When comparing yields or sugars of two varieties, the values must differ by a value equal to or greater than the LSD given at the bottom of each column. If they do not, then they were probably not different in this test.

Planted April 22, 1999; Harvested October 4-5, 1999.

1 Root yields have been tared 5%.
2 Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top resistance of two or more varieties, use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.
3 Commercial check varieties.
4 Entered in 1999 rhizomania variety test.
5 Entered as a rhizoctonia resistant variety.

                                                                      U of I Sugarbeet Home Page                                         Back One Page