UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO SUGARBEET VARIETY TRIALS, Aberdeen, Idaho, 1997
EXPERIMENTAL TRANSGENIC VARIETIES
December 8, 1997

 
 

Root Yield2

Sugar Content

Gross Sugar

K

Na

   Amino     N

Recoverable Sugar

Estimated Recoverable Sugar

   Curly     Top Rating3

VARIETY

(T/A)

(%)

(lbs/A)

(meq/100g)

(meq/100g)

(meq/100g)

(%)

(lbs/T)

(lbs/A)

1997

ACH 211 1

37.22

17.19

12817

4.188

1.338

3.719

16.00

320.0

11934

4.0

Beta 8422 1

39.19

17.41

13641

4.768

1.425

3.050

16.21

324.3

12704

4.2

Beta 8757 LL

40.52

17.14

13880

5.029

1.625

3.163

15.87

317.5

12851

4.8

Beta 8757 (2BG6303)

39.22

17.27

13560

4.808

1.350

3.269

16.05

321.0

12607

4.2

HM 104 RR

39.70

16.02

12720

5.249

1.819

3.744

14.63

292.6

11613

5.0

HM Pillar (2918)

36.91

17.26

12748

4.694

1.238

2.888

16.11

322.3

11910

4.1

HM WS91 1

40.26

16.52

13315

4.898

1.138

3.106

15.33

306.7

12361

4.0

HM WSPM9 1

38.60

15.90

12293

4.904

.969

3.625

14.66

293.3

11339

3.9

Susceptible Check

6.1

US 41 (Resistant Check)

4.2

LSD (.05)

2.08

0.73

1014

.452

N.S.

.896

0.92

18.4

N.S.

 
CV (%)

5.3

4.4

7.7

9.4

42.7

26.9

5.9

5.9

8.9

 
Pr > F

0.046

0.000

0.032

0.002

0.127

0.380

0.001

0.001

0.067

 
1   Commercial check varieties. Commercial seed obtained locally.
2  Root yields have been tared 5%.
3  Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top
      resistance of two or more varieties, use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.

 

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO SUGARBEET VARIETY TRIALS, Kimberly, Idaho, 1997
EXPERIMENTAL TRANSGENIC VARIETIES
December 8, 1997

 

Root Yield2

Sugar Content

Gross Sugar

K

Na

   Amino     N

Recoverable Sugar

Estimated Recoverable Sugar

   Curly     Top Rating3

VARIETY

(T/A)

(%)

(lbs/A)

(meq/100g)

(meq/100g)

(meq/100g)

(%)

(lbs/T)

(lbs/A)

1997

ACH 211 1

38.37

16.71

12804

4.672

.701

4.134

15.47

309.3

11847

4.0

Beta 8422 1

41.53

16.52

13702

5.666

.724

4.001

15.16

303.2

12565

4.2

Beta 8757 LL

41.24

16.77

13814

5.484

.564

3.303

15.54

310.7

12797

4.8

Beta 8757 (2BG6303)

42.56

16.74

14249

5.528

.583

3.613

15.47

309.3

13161

4.2

HM WS91 1

40.37

16.33

13185

5.224

.528

2.926

15.19

303.8

12265

4.0

HM WSPM91

40.08

15.93

12777

5.129

.439

3.247

14.77

295.4

11848

3.9

Susceptible Check

6.1

US 41 (Resistant Check)

4.2

LSD (.05)

2.41

NS

771

.479

NS

7.79

NS

NS

770

 
CV (%)

5.5

3.5

5.1

8.4

32.6

20.3

4.6

4.6

5.5

 
Pr > F

0.025

0.078

0.001

0.0023

0.079

0.025

0.338

0.338

0.004

 
 
1  Commercial check varieties. Commercial seed obtained locally.
2  Root yields have been tared 5%.
3  Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top resistance of        two or more varieties, use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.

 

Back to Sugarbeet Home Page