![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Thomas of Britian Tristan ~1175 AD |
| Gottfried von Strassburg Tristan ~1200 AD |
| "Brother Robert" Tristrams Saga 1226 AD TD> |
| Marie du France Lai de Chevrefeuil ~1250 AD |
| Anonymous Prose Tristan ~1250 AD |
| Anonymous Folie Tristan d'Oxford ~1290 AD |
| Anonymous Sir Tristram ~1300 AD |
| Anonymous La Tavola Ritonda ~1375 AD |
| Sir Thomas Malory Le Morte Darthur 1485 AD |
he Court form was the
more popular of the two. For this reason most modern texts maintain this
elevated portrayal of the characters and events. The main court tales are
listed in the progression at right. They are listed by date (or
estimated date). This progression does not reflect a specific development
of the text, but merely their chronological order.
homas of Britian's
tale, Tristan portrays the highly courtly style at an early time;
unfortunately, the tale is fragmentary. The Gottfried Tristan is
also fragmentary, but draws heavily from Thomas's text. Luckily, the
portions missing in the Gottfried are the passages found in the Thomas
and visa versa. The two therefore make a rather interesting courtly
romance. Most of the later courtly tales use these two influential works
as a model.
f these the Prose
Tristan is the most important simply because it is the first real
seamless integration of the Tristan Romance into Arthurian lore. In it
Tristan is a great friend of Lancelot -- the two are considered the
greatest knights in the realm. Tristan is an honored member of the Round
Table who participates in the Grail quest. The work is also interesting
because Mark is no longer just an idiot cuckold; he is an out and out
villian.
alory draws heavily
form the Prose Tristan in his book of Sir Tristram. He is perhaps the
first writer, however, to make the metaphorical connection between the
love triangle of Mark/Tristan/Isolde and that of
Arthur/Lancelot/Guinevere. This is not to say that connections were
not made before Malory's work; it can be argued, however, that Malory
makes the connection more deliberate, and condeming. The affair of
Tristan and Isolde in Malory is very petty, lustful and not particularly
romantic. The tale is also complicated by the fragmentary nature of the
Book of Tristram. Often times the reader is left wonder what is
happening, and sometimes knights come back from the dead as if they were
never slain (many critics would say that the entire Morte Darthur
exhibits this fragmentary nature, but none could argue that the clearest
instance of it -- if such a thing can be said -- lies in the Tristram.)

he Common versions are
far fewer in number due to lack of popularity. Perhaps many more common
tales existed with a Tristan and Isolde theme, but because of the costs
involved in producing a written text in those times -- costs that were
very substantial -- fewer common tales were recorded to paper (or vellum
as the case may be).
he Common tales are
somewhat more 'fun' than the courtly, and sometimes involve a sort of
fabliau ending or development. Some of the largest variations to the
story occur in the Common tales; nothing is sacred. In the Beroul, for
example, the potion only lasts for three years. Tristan and Isolde are
banished to a rough life in the woods when the 3 years wind down. Their
first realization is not that they have shamed themselves, their
uncle/husband and the entire court of Cornwall, but rather that they
really miss the warm comforts of a castle. They think immediately of
their lost possessions! In this way, the common tales offer more
commentary on the affair, and on society in general, which can make them
a far more interesting read.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |